Have you ever had a perfect game? (0 inaccuracies, 0 mistakes, 0 blunders)

@TheFaradayEffect @drmrboss @h809 @HumbleFrench @K_Wang @PASH10 @Toscani

0 inaccuracies, 0 mistakes, 0 blunders, 0 centipawn loss. This was an entirely legit game.

@SavageAntarctican LOL that is what I am talking about a short game.

@K_Wang I also had a game like this:


No centipawn loss for either side because no move was played.

@SavageAntarctican ref #11

That looks setup. Your opponent was >2100 there's no way they didn't do that on purpose as that's a known mate pattern. Maybe they were drunk or angry or sandbagging to enter a tournament. So you have to do better than a trick game!

@SavageAntarctican ahahaha thats funny bro. Mate in 3

I analyzed a few perfectly played games that the computer did not agree with because the analysis has its limit too.
They were games from the world correspondence championship.

How about this one?
Is stockfish 2000 broken? because he played some very bad moves, that i am sure a 2000 rated player in his right mind wouldn't play! Can someone explain to me the bad performance of stockfish 2000 in this game.

Yes. A brilliant one at that.



Totally legit too