Especially in the beginning of the scandal on cheating, i found it difficult to form an opinion, as i am lacking data. To me, a couple of videos changed my point-of-view, all by some ukrainian GM analysing Niemanns games from a couple of years back (not so much from recent history). And his findings convinced me, that Carlsen may have a general point (Hans did cheat OTB), but still nothing to prove about the actual games. I assume, that Hans did learn in the meantime, how to avoid getting caught throu current methods. not using EVERY engine suggestion, but sparsely using help at critical junctures only, which would be almost impossible to prove by todays means.
What what do i know? I am just a computer loving chess spectator trying to make up my mind.
And i disagree to the optimistic (or nationalistic) opinion from the article published via this blog.
Oh: At least one (of several) analysis can be found here:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pwtC0bH--A