And yeh, i love doin it. Proud of it.
I do that as well, but only when I find it ridiculous if they not resign. I call it "counter-assholing".
And you said it yourself, you're moving in the end, so the algorithm doesn't apply.
And you said it yourself, you're moving in the end, so the algorithm doesn't apply.
You still havent answered my post #6
See #8.
Doesnt even make sense.
Anyways "anti stalling" measures aint gonna happen, i think theres far more important developmental priorities.
Obviously you brought up this thread before with an overall response impression that its not an urgent problem that needs addressing.
Theres stalling for winners, stalling for losers, how to sort thru that crap?? You want a Harry Potter algorithm to just magically work it out. The current system is fine. I can wait for my win, and i can make others wait for their loss. No problem.
Anyways "anti stalling" measures aint gonna happen, i think theres far more important developmental priorities.
Obviously you brought up this thread before with an overall response impression that its not an urgent problem that needs addressing.
Theres stalling for winners, stalling for losers, how to sort thru that crap?? You want a Harry Potter algorithm to just magically work it out. The current system is fine. I can wait for my win, and i can make others wait for their loss. No problem.
#2 I agree, and I've suggested many times before that it would be useful to display on a player's profile statistics about how quickly that player plays so prospective opponents can make informed decisions.
It's far more challenging to make rules for "this player violated a rule" versus "this player plays in a manner that I personally might not enjoy playing against".
It's far more challenging to make rules for "this player violated a rule" versus "this player plays in a manner that I personally might not enjoy playing against".
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.